In this marital dissolution case, the Court held that the trial court was within its discretion to decide that the plaintiff should not share or benefit in any value increase subsequent to the valuation date, despite the fact that the parties’ neutral business appraiser testified that the value of the subject units was $1,126,000 and the defendant subsequently received a distribution of over $8 million after the sale of a division of the subject company. 

Note: Full-text of this case can be accessed by clicking on the name of the case.