• Services
    • Valuation Services
    • Investment Banking
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Our Team
  • Insights
    • Newsletters
    • Relevant Court Cases
    • Relevant Business Valuation Articles
    • Published Articles
    • Related Links
  • Contact
    • E-Mail
    • Map
  • Home

The Pros and Cons of Using
EBITDA to Value a Business

March 2023

EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is one of the most used measures of cash flow to value businesses.  Multiples of EBITDA derived from comparable companies are applied to the subject company to determine a value not including interest-bearing debt, otherwise known as “enterprise value”.  EBITDA measures cash flow available to pay taxes and debt and to expense depreciation and amortization.  

The advantages of using EBITDA include: 1) it is easy to calculate; 2) it is commonly used and understood; 3) it is widely accepted as a value metric, and; 4) is easily applied to the subject business. 

Criticisms of using EBITDA include: 1) it is too simplistic; 2) it doesn’t consider capital expenditures; 3) it doesn’t consider the level of debt; 4) it doesn’t consider the level of taxes; 5) it doesn’t consider the level of net income; and 6) EBITDA doesn’t conform to “GAAP” (Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures).  EBITDA also doesn’t specifically take into account the expected growth in cash flow, as is done in a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) valuation that utilizes projected cash flows.  Anticipated growth, however, can be considered by adjusting the market multiple of EBITDA used to value the subject business. 

A “comparable” business with positive EBITDA could have negative net income, which is not a good thing, or have much higher or lower levels of debt or capital expenditure needs than the subject business.  Therefore, EBITDA should only be used when the comparable companies are truly comparable with respect to the things EBITDA doesn’t measure. 

All in all, although the use of EBITDA has its drawbacks, it continues to be widely used to value businesses, due mainly to its ease of use.  Its drawbacks can be mitigated by the use of other metrics to value the subject business such as a DCF or by using market multiples of other measures of cash flow or earnings such as net cash flow or net income. 



Relevant Court Cases

  • Cecil v. Commissioner, United States Tax Court, Docket Nos. 14639.14, 14640.14, filed February 28, 2023

  • Estate of Hoensheid v. Commissioner, United States Tax Court, Docket No. 18606-19, filed March 15, 2023



Recent Business Valuation Articles

  • “Corporate Bond Moments and Predictability of Equity Returns,” by Sophia Zhengzi Li, Peixuan Yuan, and Guofu Zhou, dated March 1, 2023

  • “Estimating the Market’s Expected, Return and Uncertainty From Option Prices,” by Nikhil Jaisinghani, dated February 2023



Recent Engagements

  • Valuation of the common stock of a manufacturing and distribution conglomerate for purchase/sale purposes.

  • Valuation of limited partnership interests in an elemental metal processing facility on a minority interest basis for planning purposes.

  • Valuation of member interests of an investment holding company on a minority interest basis for trust administration purposes.

  • Valuation of the common stock of a niche chemical manufacturing company on a 100% controlling and a minority interest basis for planning purposes.

1065 Executive Parkway, Suite 205
St. Louis, MO 63141
Ph. 314.434.3800
Fax 314.434.3809
2023 Capital Advisors, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
"St. Louis Arch"; "Capital Advisors, Inc."; "Building"; "Conference Room"; "St. Louis Sky"; "Crane";