In this case, Taxinet Corp. sued Santiago Leon asserting a number of claims related to a joint effort to gain a government concession for a taxi-hailing app in Mexico City.  The appeals court ruled that the district court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that most of Taxinet’s evidence of the venture’s valuation at trial constituted inadmissible hearsay and should not have been admitted.  

Note: Full-text of this case can be accessed by clicking on the name of the case.